......is the limit caused by a hardware character ?

Nope. It's an editor limitation.

Dave

Post by TheOtherSupport@KMI » Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:10 pm
..... (I don't even think Microsoft supports Windows Vista anymore).....

extended support, apparently, 'til April 11 2017. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/lifecycle

Dave

I just tried this & couldn't get it to work either! Having said that I'm not very familiar with standalone mode, since I've never used it. But I couldn't get any Navpad messages from the SS1 or SS2, in standalone mode, with scene changing off, the expander port connected, on Port 1 or port 2 in ...

Absolutely correct - apparently - according to the new manual, but given all other long press, short trig/dble trig/ latch/ navpad etc modes are stated as hosted mode only, I wouldn't hold my breath!
I haven't investigated this yet, but it looks intriguing (from a hosted viewpoint!).

Dave

. The raw data is just, raw. There are no sensitivity adjustments that can be performed on the raw data using the editor — those need to be handled on the user end if going the raw data route. The "real" data comes after passing through the standalone firmware functions (or through the ed...

So you are using the softstep with the KMI editor? Are you saying that attempting to use the individual pad sensors to trigger events is invalid then? Because it was possible on the SS1, though not so conveniently laid out I thought. This gave the possibility of having up to 44 separate functions in...

Thanks for your attention. I'm monitoring through SSCOM1, without the KMI editor running. I use this just to load an INIT setup, so the SS2 is putting out raw CCs. I then shut down the editor. Then I measure with MIDI Monitor. No, It doesn't 'just' put out 0, 61, 127 (ie only those values), but that...

Just to post in the correct forum a request I mentioned in the users' help a few days ago.... In the event of another firmware update, could we have a less sensitive version please? i.e. when increasing pressure gradually on a pad, the raw output doesn't just go 0, 61, 127, but actually fills in a f...

OK, sysex librarian worked fine, & I've successfully loaded, 88, 91, 88 again etc. Curiously, my advanced editor, when it's fired up informs me 'update needed - expected: 88, found: 91'. Logically (and according to the file dates!) 91 is more recent than 88, but the editor doesn't seem to think ...

... A common complaint about SoftStep 1 was that it was too difficult to trigger. I like the new sensitivity, but it's possible we went a bit beyond the happy medium. Yep, I think I would agree with both those statements, so thanks for the links guys, I'll get on it & try them out. I take it I ...