Search found 64 matches

Go to advanced search

by DaveDraper
Sun Feb 22, 2015 10:26 am
Forum: SoftStep Feature Wishlist
Topic: Nav Keys Programmable
Replies: 16
Views: 10977

Re: Nav Keys Programmable

......is the limit caused by a hardware character ?


Nope. It's an editor limitation.

Dave
by DaveDraper
Tue Nov 25, 2014 1:05 am
Forum: SoftStep Users' Help Exchange
Topic: softstep & editors
Replies: 7
Views: 3941

Re: softstep & editors

Post by TheOtherSupport@KMI » Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:10 pm
..... (I don't even think Microsoft supports Windows Vista anymore).....


extended support, apparently, 'til April 11 2017. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/lifecycle

Dave
by DaveDraper
Sat Jun 28, 2014 1:24 am
Forum: SoftStep Feature Wishlist
Topic: Nav Keys Programmable
Replies: 16
Views: 10977

Re: Nav Keys Programmable

I just tried this & couldn't get it to work either! Having said that I'm not very familiar with standalone mode, since I've never used it. But I couldn't get any Navpad messages from the SS1 or SS2, in standalone mode, with scene changing off, the expander port connected, on Port 1 or port 2 in ...
by DaveDraper
Sun Jun 08, 2014 9:10 am
Forum: SoftStep Users' Help Exchange
Topic: Additional Control in Standalone Mode
Replies: 4
Views: 2237

Re: Additional Control in Standalone Mode

Absolutely correct - apparently - according to the new manual, but given all other long press, short trig/dble trig/ latch/ navpad etc modes are stated as hosted mode only, I wouldn't hold my breath!
I haven't investigated this yet, but it looks intriguing (from a hosted viewpoint!).

Dave
by DaveDraper
Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:29 pm
Forum: SoftStep Feature Wishlist
Topic: Hardware sensitivity
Replies: 8
Views: 4904

Re: Hardware sensitivity

. The raw data is just, raw. There are no sensitivity adjustments that can be performed on the raw data using the editor — those need to be handled on the user end if going the raw data route. The "real" data comes after passing through the standalone firmware functions (or through the ed...
by DaveDraper
Wed Jun 04, 2014 3:23 pm
Forum: SoftStep Feature Wishlist
Topic: Hardware sensitivity
Replies: 8
Views: 4904

Re: Hardware sensitivity

So you are using the softstep with the KMI editor? Are you saying that attempting to use the individual pad sensors to trigger events is invalid then? Because it was possible on the SS1, though not so conveniently laid out I thought. This gave the possibility of having up to 44 separate functions in...
by DaveDraper
Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:32 pm
Forum: SoftStep Feature Wishlist
Topic: Hardware sensitivity
Replies: 8
Views: 4904

Re: Hardware sensitivity

Thanks for your attention. I'm monitoring through SSCOM1, without the KMI editor running. I use this just to load an INIT setup, so the SS2 is putting out raw CCs. I then shut down the editor. Then I measure with MIDI Monitor. No, It doesn't 'just' put out 0, 61, 127 (ie only those values), but that...
by DaveDraper
Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:38 am
Forum: SoftStep Feature Wishlist
Topic: Hardware sensitivity
Replies: 8
Views: 4904

Hardware sensitivity

Just to post in the correct forum a request I mentioned in the users' help a few days ago.... In the event of another firmware update, could we have a less sensitive version please? i.e. when increasing pressure gradually on a pad, the raw output doesn't just go 0, 61, 127, but actually fills in a f...
by DaveDraper
Fri May 30, 2014 5:37 am
Forum: SoftStep Users' Help Exchange
Topic: SS2 sensitivity
Replies: 6
Views: 2717

Re: SS2 sensitivity

OK, sysex librarian worked fine, & I've successfully loaded, 88, 91, 88 again etc. Curiously, my advanced editor, when it's fired up informs me 'update needed - expected: 88, found: 91'. Logically (and according to the file dates!) 91 is more recent than 88, but the editor doesn't seem to think ...
by DaveDraper
Thu May 29, 2014 12:05 am
Forum: SoftStep Users' Help Exchange
Topic: SS2 sensitivity
Replies: 6
Views: 2717

Re: SS2 sensitivity

... A common complaint about SoftStep 1 was that it was too difficult to trigger. I like the new sensitivity, but it's possible we went a bit beyond the happy medium. Yep, I think I would agree with both those statements, so thanks for the links guys, I'll get on it & try them out. I take it I ...

Go to advanced search

cron